Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
- If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
Author Guidelines
Summary of requirements
A manuscript should normally be divided into the followings parts:
Title page
Abstract
Introduction
Materials (or Subjects) and Methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgments (optional)
References
Legends for figures
Tables
Figures
Types of manuscripts
Original research
Narrative reviews
Systematic review articles and Meta-analyses
Short communications
Editorials
Letter to editor
Commentaries
Specific Reporting Guidelines
Article categories |
Abstract and key words |
Word limit |
Tables /figures |
references |
considerations |
Original research |
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical Trials
|
Structured abstract: • Objective, Design, Setting, Subjects, Results, and Conclusions 3–6 keywords |
Abstract: 250 words Article: 3,000 words max excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. |
Max of 6 |
Max of 50. Please use as recent as possible. |
Include the full name of the relevant ethics committee that approved the work. For clinical trials follow CONSORT reporting guidelines appropriate to their trial design, available on the CONSORT Statement website. It's necessary to provide the registry name and number in the methods section of the manuscript. Completion of CONSORT checklist as Supporting Information (which will be published alongside the paper, if accepted) is necessary for submission. Include the CONSORT flow diagram as the manuscript's "Figure 1" Informed consent should be discussed in the manuscript.
|
Animal Research |
Structured abstract: • Objective, Design, Setting, Subjects, Results, and Conclusions 3–6 keywords |
Abstract: 250 words Article: 3,000 words max excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. |
Max of 6 |
Max of 50. Please use as recent as possible. |
Include the full name of the relevant ethics committee that approved the work and the associated permit number (where ethical approval is not required, the manuscript should include a clear statement of this and the reason why). Describe in details how did you do to ameliorate animal suffering. Relevant details for efforts taken to ameliorate animal suffering It's recommended to follow the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines for all submissions describing laboratory-based animal research. Completion of ARRIVE Guidelines Checklist is necessary for submission. |
Observational and Field Studies
|
Structured abstract: • Objective, Design, Setting, Subjects, Results, and Conclusions 3–6 keywords |
Abstract: 250 words Article: 3,000 words max excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. |
Max of 6 |
Max of 50. Please use as recent as possible. |
Include ethics statements that specify study had permission and approvals obtained for the work, including the full name of the authority that approved the study; if none were required, authors should explain why
|
Cell Line Research
|
Structured abstract: • Objective, Design, Setting, Subjects, Results, and Conclusions 3–6 keywords |
Abstract: 250 words
Article: 3,000 words max excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. |
Max of 6 |
Max of 50. Please use as recent as possible. |
Include the origin of any cell lines in methods section. State the provenance for established cell lines and give references for it. For cell line of human origin, details of institutional review board or ethics committee approval and confirmation of written informed consent must be provided. |
Narrative review |
Unstructured abstract
3-6 keywords |
Abstract: 250 words
Article: 4500 words max excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. |
Max of 8 |
Max of 100 |
Narrative reviews in specific topics are solicited by the Editor. Proposals for reviews may be submitted by sending a covering letter and abstract to the Editor for consideration. In methods section include search criteria and selection and total number of articles studied and the total number selected for inclusion in the review. Before acceptance all invited reviews will undergo peer review. |
Meta-analysis/ Systematic reviews |
Structured abstract: • Objective, Design, Setting, Subjects, Results, and Conclusions 3–6 keywords |
Abstract: 250 words
Article: 5,000 words max excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. |
|
|
Reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses must include a completed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist and flow diagram to accompany the main text. Please state in your cover letter If your article is a Systematic Review or a Meta-Analysis. Select "Research Article" as your article type when submitting Include the PRISMA flowchart as Figure 1 (required where applicable) Include the PRISMA checklist.
|
Short communications |
|
|
|
|
|
Letters to the Editor
|
No abstract required. |
1,000 words max excluding, references, figures and tables. |
Max of 2 |
Max of 6 |
Letters must contain specific and hot information to a certain area or must be referencing data recently published in JNSD. Please reference the original source for title of the letter, although, authors can use an arbitrary title. |
Editorials (by invitation only) |
No abstract required. |
1,000 words |
Max of 2 |
Max of 6 |
Proposals for Editorials may be submitted; however, authors should only send a proposal paper for initial consideration. |
Commentaries |
No abstract required. |
1,000 words |
- |
Max of 6 |
|
Manuscript preparations
Font
The manuscript should be in Word document format (not as a PDF file). A manuscript including title page should be prepared with double-line spacing, wide margins 2.5 cm and the 12-fontTimes New Romans size. The abstract and text pages should have consecutive line numbers in the left margin beginning in the abstract and ending before the reference section. Number pages consecutively in the lower right-hand corner of each page, beginning with the title page. If your manuscript is or will be in .docx format and contains equations, you must follow the instructions below to make sure that your equations are editable when the file enters production.
If you have not yet composed your article, you can ensure that the equations in your .docx file remain editable in .doc by enabling "Compatibility Mode" before you begin. To do this, open a new document and save as Word 97-2003 (*.doc). Several features of Word 2007/10 will now be inactive, including the built-in equation editing tool.
The term diabetic should not be used as a noun. Do not use level when referring to a concentration. Use metric units of measure.
Title Page
Every manuscript, regardless of article type, must have an accompanying title page (authors and title). The full title must be 250 characters or fewer. Do not use abbreviations if possible. In the title only first letter of the first word should be capitalized.
Example:
- Shab-Bidar S, Neyestani TR, Djazayery A, Eshraghian MR, Houshiarrad A, Kalayi A, et al. Regular consumption of vitamin D-fortified yogurt drink (Doogh) improved endothelial biomarkers in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
In addition to the title, the title page should include a short running title (less than 45 letters and spaces in length); the first name, middle initial, and last name of each author; affiliation of each author during the time the study was conducted; name, current address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address of the corresponding author; the word count, and number of tables and figures. The title page should also include a statement reporting any conflicts of interest, all sources of funding, the contribution of each author to the manuscript, a list of abbreviations and their definitions, registration number of clinical trials from clinical trials.gov and any ethical information as detailed above Table. The title page should be submitted as a separate page.
Abstract
Each original paper must have a structured and informative abstract not more than 250 words, with six paragraphs: Background, Objective, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. Abstracts should not include citations and abbreviations, if possible.
Trial registration
If your research article reports the results of a controlled clinical intervention, please list your trial registry, along with the unique identifying number (e.g. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01236846). Please note that there should be no space between the letters and numbers of your trial registration number. We recommend manuscripts that report randomized controlled trials following the CONSORT extension for abstracts. (http://www.consort-statement.org/index.aspx?o=1190)
Keywords
It is recommended to use up to six keywords; chosen from MEDLINE MeSH, for representing the main content of the article.
Introduction
A short introduction, not more than one page, is necessary. The Introduction should be concise and state the main research question and the purpose and importance of the study, with relevant references.
Materials/Subjects and Methods
Use materials for non-human and subjects for human studies (Materials/Methods or Subjects/Methods). This section should provide enough details to allow suitably skilled investigators to fully replicate your study. Specific information and/or protocols for new methods should be included in detail. If materials, methods (including statistical methods), and protocols are well established, authors may cite articles where those protocols are described in detail, but the submission should include sufficient information to be understood independent of these references. The methods section should include the design of the study, the setting, the type of participants or materials involved, a clear description of all interventions and comparisons, and the type of analysis used, including a power calculation if appropriate. Generic drug names should generally be used. When proprietary brands are used in research, include the brand names in parentheses.
For studies involving human participants a statement detailing ethical approval and consent should be included in the methods section. In papers reporting results of research using cell lines the origin of the cell lines should be mentioned.
Ethics
When reporting experiments on human subjects, indicate that the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible institutional or regional committee on human experimentation or in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 as revised in 1983. Do not use patients’ names, initials, or hospital identification numbers. When reporting experiments on animals, indicate approval by the institution’s animal welfare committee and state whether the National Research Council’s guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
Statistics
Describe statistical methods with enough details. Use appropriate indicators (e.g., CIs, SDs, or SEs) to present your data even for differences that were not significant. Numbers of observations should be reported. Include general descriptions of statistical methods in the Subjects (or Materials) and Methods section and specific descriptions in each table and figure legend. Include testing for normality distribution and explain what you did for non-normally distributed data. Indicate the level of significance used in tests if different from the conventional 2-sided 5% alpha error and whether or what type of adjustment was made for multiple comparisons. Describe all computer software used for analyzing data including the version number and the manufacturer’s name and address.
Results
Results should be presented as concisely as possible, in a logical sequence with subheadings for subjects, measurements (for example, anthropometric measurements, laboratory investigations,..), text, figures or tables as appropriate. Avoid duplication of data from tables and figures in the text.
Discussion
Discussion should be started with the main findings of the study. The new and significant aspects of the study should be emphasized concisely and compared with previously published reports. There should be accordance between objectives and conclusions of your study. Please include strengths and limitations of the study. Make recommendations and potential future directions for research when warranted by the results. The Discussion should not exceed 4 typewritten pages. Do not repeat in detail data or other material given in the Introduction or Results. A clear conclusion should be drawn at the end of the discussion.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments should contain the author contributions paragraph??, brief statements of assistance, the guarantor's name (person[s] taking responsibility for the contents of the article), funding/financial support, and reference to prior publication of the study in abstract form, where applicable.
References
Cite references in the Vancouver style. References should be numbered sequentially in the order in which they first appear in the text in square brackets. All references cited in the text should be listed at the end of the manuscript on a separate page.
The names of all authors should be listed for papers with up to six authors; for papers with more than six authors, the first six only should be listed, followed by et al. Abbreviations for titles of medical periodicals should conform to those used in the latest edition of Index Medicus. The first and last page numbers for each reference should be provided. Papers in press may be included in the list of references.
References to periodicals should be as follows: names and initials of authors, title of paper, abbreviated journal title (conforming to those used in Index Medicus), year, and first and last pages of the article.
Book references should be as follows: author, initials, title of book, title of series and volume number (if applicable), publisher and city, and year.
Examples
Article (up to six authors)
Shab-Bidar S, Neyestani TR, Djazayery A, Eshraghian MR, Houshiarrad A, Kalayi A, et al. Improvement of vitamin D status resulted in amelioration of biomarkers of systemic inflammation in the subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012:28(5):424-30.
Journal article, e-pub ahead of print
Shab-Bidar S, Neyestani TR, Djazayery A, Eshraghian MR, Houshiarrad A, Kalayi A, Shariatzadeh N, Khalaji N, Gharavi A. Improvement of vitamin D status resulted in amelioration of biomarkers of systemic inflammation in the subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Feb 17. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2290.
Journal article, in press
Shab-Bidar S, Bours S, Geusens P, Kessels A, van den Bergh J. Serum 25(OH)D response to vitamin D3 supplementation: A meta-regression analysis. Nutrition (in press).
Corporate author
National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143–421.
Chapter in book
Johnson RK. Energy. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, editors. Krause's food, nutrition & diet therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000, p. 19-30.
Book
Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routeledge; 1993.
Website
National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Version current 1 October 2003. Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm (accessed 13 October 2003).
Online journal article
Sinha A, Madden J, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai S, Platt R. Reduced risk of neonatal respiratory infections among breastfed girls but not boys. Pediatrics [serial online] 2003;112:e303. Internet: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/112/4/e303 (accessed 14 October 2003).
Figure Legends
Legends for all figures should be brief and specific and appear on a separate page after the References section. Legends should be in 10-point and single spaced (Times New Roman). Details for statistics and non-standard abbreviations for study groups used in a figure should be defined in alphabetic order. Identify any symbols, numbers or letters used in the figures.
Tables
Each table should be inserted on a separate page at the end of the manuscript with the table number, title, and legend indicated. The title should clearly and concisely describe the treatments and experimental animals or human subjects (participants). Information regarding methods or explanatory material should be given as Table legend. Table legends should be inserted below the table and should not be included inside the table. Use "insert Table" in Word software for creating tables. Please use Times New Roman font, no smaller than 10-point. Units of measure should be clearly indicated after the variable in rows, above the first value in each column, or centered over all columns to which the unit applies. Statistics of variability (e.g., SD, pooled SEM) and the significance of differences among the data should be shown. Apply the following sequence of symbols, from top to bottom, left to right: *, †, ‡, §, ||, ¶, #, **, ††, ‡‡ for more explanation of data of tables in Table legend.
Figures
Figures should be prepared in the following formats: PDF, TIFF, GIF, JPG, or BMP with a high resolution. Apply clearly labels and units of measure (where appropriate) for axes. Use letters and symbols to show significant differences. If figures have 2 or more panels, explain each panel in the legend, beginning with the panel letter. Panels should be the same height and/or width and so line up with one another vertically and/or horizontally, and should be submitted on a single page. Separate panels should be labeled A, B, C, D, etc. in the upper-left corner, near the graph. Text font size should be consistent both within each figure and among all figures in the document. Do not use unnecessary color for histograms, line drawings, etc.
Cover letter
Prepare a cover letter containing complete contact details (postal address, , email address, telephone and fax numbers) of the corresponding author. Please state that the manuscript has not been previously published and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JNSD. Add a note about conflict of interest.
Nomination of reviewers
Suggest the names of up to five reviewers with their email addresses.
Language
Manuscripts must be prepared in clear, standard and understandable English. Non-native English authors may wish to get help from the assistance of an English-proficient colleague. For English translation of manuscripts it is recommended to use a communications agency, such as American Journal Experts (AJE currently provides translations for the following languages: Chinese, Portuguese and Spanish). The following link also is recommended for editing: Web shop (http://webshop.elsevier.com/languageservices) to provide an English translation of their manuscript for submission and to help improve the clarity and readability of a paper before it is submitted to the journal. Review the tips for technical writing here: http://www.nature.com/authors/author_resources/how_write.html.
Proofs
Authors are sent page-proofs by email. These should be checked immediately and corrections, as well as answers to any queries, returned to the publishers as an annotated PDF via email or fax within 2 working days (further details are supplied with the proof). It is the corresponding author's responsibility to check proofs thoroughly.
Submission process
All material to be considered for publication in the Journal of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics (JNSD) should be submitted in electronic form via http://journals.tums.ac.ir. Instructions on how to submit your manuscript online can be found in the web site.
Plagiarism
We use iThenticate to screen papers for similarity to previously published papers. Papers will be rejected outright or returned to authors for rewriting if there are disproportionate similarities to published papers. References and title page material are excluded in this check.
The following are examples of plagiarism:
- Copying the published words of other authors or modifying only slightly, with or without citation of the original work.
- Reusing the author's own previously published words, with or without citation (self-plagiarism).
- Failure to quote and/or acknowledge by citation substantially similar ideas, content, tables, or illustrations that have been published or copyrighted by others.
Copyright form
The entire contents of the NFSR are protected under international copyrights. This Journal is for your personal noncommercial use. You may not modify copy, distribute, transmit, display, or publish any materials contained in the Journal without prior written permission of the journal or the appropriate copyright owner.
Review process
All submitted manuscripts are considered to peer review and editorial approval What do you exactly mean?. Manuscripts will be sent to at least three anonymous reviewers. Authors are usually notified within 1-2 months about the acceptability of their manuscript. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise within the topic area of the submission, and the purpose is to assist the authors and the journal by providing a critical review of the manuscript. On receiving reviewer's comments, the corresponding author is notified as soon as possible of the editor decision to accept, reject, or require modifications. For those manuscripts that require revision, the corresponding author is requested to send the revised version. If accepted, the manuscript will be scheduled for publication in the next available issue.
List of check lists, diagrams and flowcharts for authors and reviewers
Observational cohort, case control and cross sectional studies |
STROBE Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology |
Quasi experimental / non-randomized evaluations |
TREND - Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs http://www.equator-network.org/index.aspx?o=1032 |
Randomised (and quasi-randomised) controlled trials
|
CONSORT – Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials |
Studies on Diagnostic accuracy / assessment scale |
STARD Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy studies |
Systematic Review of Controlled Trials |
PRISMA - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
MOOSE Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology |
Submission Preparation Checklist
Before sending your manuscript to the journal's Editor, please make sure that you have taken care of all the necessary details:
1) Double-spaced manuscript MS Word-compatible format; with structured abstract (up to 250 words), pages numbered, running head, key words, author(s)' full names and affiliations.
2) Photos, legends, tables, and/or figures numbered sequentially.
3) Cover letter containing statement regarding declaration of authorship, of scientific integrity, and of any potential conflict of interest (See Competing Interest Form).
4) Address, e-mail, phone number and FAX number of corresponding author.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.